Federagenti denunciation that the harbour reform, launched after ten years of wait, is still firm to the pole



Federagenti has launch today a strong alarm on the outcomes and the effectiveness of the launched harbour reform by now more than six months ago from the government with decrees of "Reorganization, rationalization and simplification of the harbour authorities" that it is published in the "Gazette" 31st August and that it previews mainly measures of bureaucratic simplification and the reorganization of the management of the Italian ports with the institution of 15 Authorities of Harbour System to the place of the 24 Harbour Authorities that up to now have governed the main national ports ( on 29 July 2016).

"Ten years are intentional in order to make it", it has emphasized president of the National Federation Agenti, Raccomandatari Marine and Mediating Marine, Gian Enzo Duci, referring to the wait reform of the legilazione in harbour matter. "Now - it has added - we hope that of they are not necessary as many in order to return it executive and to apply it compiutamente".

According to the president of Federagenti, the delays regard the entire scaffolding of the reform that marks the step on various fronts: "with 6-7 ports still in search of a president - it has found - seem to resurface dramatically logical of pure political character for positions that it would demand today subject equipped - as the reform previews - of incontestable professionalities and experience".

"This - it has specified the president of Federagenti - regards the summits of the Harbour Authorities of System, but also the Committees of management that, except rare exceptions (and between these we record with it like that of Umberto Masucci that has renounced to its assignments of private entrepreneur in order to participate to the difficult effort of I throw again of the port of Naples), propose qualitatively debatable choices".

"From a formal point of view - it has continued Duci - the displacement of the productive categories from the decisional organ, the Harbour Committee, to an advisory one, the Table of partnership, would seem a reduction of the weight of the "private one" regarding the "public" in the governance harbour; however I I believe that this is a game still all to play. Online theoretical the tables of partnership, if managed properly, could guarantee a remarkable specific weight to the private entrepreneurs, a perhaps greater weight of that of substantial witnesses whom they had in the Harbour Committees about which, it is not forgotten, incarnated the minority of ballot (regarding subjects publics and unions). But the partnership, junior clerk for years in France and object today own beyond frontier of a deep critical review, demands a complex experimentation and a rigorous application. And - it has observed Duci - it has certainly not been left with the just foot; the same one is worth for a lot emphasized national table of coordination of the choices".

According to Federagenti, "this table, up to now nonexistent, of which the names of the ministerial members are not known not even, is already becoming the land for a fight between categories to the search of seats and roles".

"And all this - it has concluded Duci - happens in a moment to say little complex of the world-wide and Italian portualità, swept up from the phenomenon of the concentrations, the income in force of trusts and from a revolution of market whose effects would go as a minimum managed from the Authorities of Harbour System".