
With the only not entirely unexpected exception of the reaction of
Intertanko, the association that represents the
operating fleets of tanker vessels, all other
Main international organizations of operators in the sector
have expressed disappointment at the one-year postponement
decided on Friday by the Marine Environment Protection Committee
of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) definition
of the Net-Zero Framework strategy for the decarbonization of shipping
(
of
17
October 2025). To the disappointment expressed in the heat of the moment by several
leading associations in this market, have now been added
manifestations of more or less accentuated disappointment than other
representatives of the sector.
Regret for the missed opportunity was expressed by the
CLECAT, the European association representing companies of
shipping and logistics, which reiterated the importance of a
global regulatory framework defined by the IMO to prevent the
Carbon leakage from transportation
maritime. CLECAT highlighted that "regulations
inconsistent regional inconsistencies could encourage carriers to
redirect ships to areas with less stringent environmental standards.
Fragmentation - underlined the association - not only
would weaken decarbonisation efforts, but would also create
unfair competition conditions, in particular for operators
European. The maritime sector needs clarity, not
further uncertainty". CLECAT specified that it will continue
to commit to a robust regulatory framework in line with the
global climate goals.
The World Shipping Council (WSC) and Intercargo, the associations
representing respectively the shipowners who
Fleets of container ships operate and those operating fleets
bulk carriers, urged the use of the one-year postponement
to fill some gaps that in their opinion the current draft presents
settlement agreement, in order to ensure an effective global agreement.
Recalling that "the 2023 IMO Greenhouse Gas Strategy and the
investment trajectory remain aligned towards
the goal of net zero emissions by 2050', the WSC
reiterated the need for 'an agreed framework to
global level to ensure a level playing field for
achieve this goal. The maritime transport sector of
line - specified the association - is committed to
achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 and has
invested $150 billion in ships designed to work
with ecological fuels. The IMO remains the right venue to provide
a global solution. We are committed to continuing to cooperate with
governments to ensure the necessary regulatory consistency, support
production and infrastructure for renewable fuels and
maintaining the energy transition of maritime transport on the
good road."
Intercargo also reiterated its support for the IMO "in
as the only global regulator capable of adopting consistent measures
and effective for international maritime transport. Hope
that the current postponement - commented the Secretary General of
Intercargo, Kostas Gkonis - represents an opportunity for a
further dialogue. The time ahead should be used in
a constructive and effective way to bridge differences of position
between IMO Member States and to ensure that the voice and the
contribution of the sector are listened to and acknowledged. We invite the
IMO Member States to cooperate more closely between
but also in partnership with the maritime community, to
agree on a realistic, practical and applicable regulatory framework
global level".
The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA), the
voice of operators active in the segment of the supply of
fuels to the naval sector, taking note of the joke
of the strategy imposed by the MEPC, a meeting from which the
expected a different outcome, reiterated his support for the
efforts for the decarbonization of shipping at the IMO by taking
whereas at present the issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions
greenhouse gas emissions, and in particular the pricing of
emissions, is evidently politically controversial for many
countries to the point that reaching a consensus at this stage is not
possible.
Much less optimistic was the reaction
of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the international association
which deals with all issues of environmental protection,
according to which "the current delay in the adoption of Net-Zero
Framework represents a missed opportunity and - specified Natacha
Stamatiou, Head of Global Shipping and EDF Delegation
at the IMO - a setback that will derail the
timeline agreed by countries as part of the 2023 strategy
of the International Maritime Organization. Any delay - has
denounced - means that innovation will have difficulties
inequalities will widen and the transition will become more widespread.
towards clean shipping will become more
difficult and expensive". The association noted that the postponement
"delays crucial progress, postponing the start of the
implementation initially planned for 2028 and slowing down the
negotiations on the detailed guidelines that should have
start next week on the occasion of the twentieth
Intersessional Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ISWG-GHG
20)'. "We know - Stamatiou underlined - that the
Progress is possible when governments act together. Hour
they have the opportunity to prove it. We can't afford
to wait any longer. It is essential that Member States return
at the negotiating table and take measures that reflect a wise
ambition, ensuring a just and sustainable energy transition
to ensure a cleaner and fairer future for the
future generations".
For the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science & Technology
(IMarEST), the association of engineers and scientists that deals with
marine environment, the postponement of the Net-Zero program by one year
Framework represents "a major blow to decarbonization
maritime transport' and 'now causes greater
uncertainty about how and when to invest in new ships and fuels. The
Framework - the association noted - would have made the transport
maritime sector the first and, so far, the only sector with reductions
binding emissions: a huge feather in the cap for the
maritime sector and an even bigger win for the
climate".