Independent journal on economy and transport policy
06:32 GMT+1
This page has been automatically translated by Original news
PORTS
The Council of State also rejected the appeal by the Gioia Tauro Oil Company
The port authority had rejected the company's applications for a concession
Gioia Tauro
June 18, 2024
After the Regional Administrative Court for Calabria, the Council of State has also
accepted the reasons of the Port System Authority of the Seas
Southern Tyrrhenian and Ionian Sea, rejecting the appeal on appeal
proposed by the Società Petrolifera Gioia Tauro (SPGT) in the
against the Port Authority, which had rejected the requests for
concession submitted by the company in 1995 for the
construction of a coastal depot for the storage of oils
minerals (gasoline and diesel) with a capacity of 40 thousand cubic meters
Organized in 14 tanks. The Council of State - highlighted
the AdSP, commenting on the pronouncement of Palazzo Spada - judged
'It is entirely legitimate to refuse a private application which,
through public funding pursuant to Law No. 488,
sadly known in the Calabrian territory, she would have liked to realize
a settlement devoid of public interest in an area with obvious
seismic risk, so much so that the complex preliminary procedure had not been
never perfected over the decades."
The case began in 1995 when the SPGT filed an application
concession to the Port Authority of Reggio Calabria. After
in 1997
the Maritime Authority expressed itself with a partial acceptance
and came to the conclusion of an act of submission which provided for the
concession by the public administration of the
possibility to start the works, with the reservation of blocking them
in the face of the negative outcome of the investigation, also defining its
the consequent and total assumption of responsibility by the
of the private sector. After signing the interim deed in 1998, the Company
Petrolifera Gioia Tauro began work while the
administrative, by competence, passed to the instituted
Port Authority of Gioia Tauro. Being in a phase of
submission, the preliminary process proceeded with the
involvement of the Superior Council of Public Works which, in
proof of the complexity of the matter, between 1998 and 2001,
expressed itself in various pronouncements, requesting additions
structural deficiencies in the tanks (for the
which had not been envisaged for the construction of a
containment at the base of the tanks for the protection of the
and the lack of design of an approach for the barges.
This led to the first halt in 2000
imposed by the Harbour Master's Office of Gioia Tauro which,
in acquiring the resolutions of the Council of Public Works,
highlighted the lack of correspondence between what was achieved
and what has been designed. But in the following year, the Superior Council
of Public Works authorized the continuation of the
works on land and not those relating to the coastal approach, for the
which required the company to submit three technical studies: one
related to the extreme seismic risk that could be generated
from the construction of the work, also considering the seismic belt
1 on which the port of Gioia Tauro falls; It was also requested that
the analysis of the consequent modification of the morphology of the coastline,
following the possible construction of a coastal approach, and
Finally, with the third study, the company was invited to analyze
any change that could be made to the morphological nature of the
mono-granural sands, due to their own liquefaction.
The PSA specified that the SPGT had never responded to these
analytical requests made by the Council of Public Works.
In 2004 the Port Authority, in the meantime established,
took charge of the concession request and requested
SPGT to resume work, which has been at a standstill since 2003. After a thorough
In 2006, the Port Authority issued a
forfeiture decree for failure to carry out the work, and
for non-use of the concession. The latter decision
it was also confirmed by the Regional Administrative Court of Reggio Calabria which, when asked
by SPGT, dismissed the appeal. But in 2008, the
Council of State overturned the court's ruling
and annulled the effects of the decree
of the Port Authority. From that moment until 2017,
No work was done to complete the work.
However, after 14 years of inactivity, SPGT made the request
completion of the concession process on grounds of urgency.
In fact, given the failure to carry out the work, the MISE,
holder of the public funding deriving from the note and
unproductive Law 488, demanded the return of public money
with withdrawal of funding. Once the investigation has resumed, the Authority
of the Port System of the Southern Tyrrhenian and Ionian Seas updated
administrative practice and asked again for the production
documents that have already been repeatedly requested from the company and never
Produced. In view of a possible and imminent loss of the
funding, SPGT modified the project to reduce the number of
tanks, changing the destination of the activity, which from
would move to trading only, and assuming a
Mooring along the north quay, intended for public use
Multifunctional. At that point, the port authority set up a
technical table which, in evaluating the new proposal, expressed the
and submitted it to the Port Committee which, in
In turn, he endorsed the Authority's decision.
The last steps of the affair, in 2021, see the Authority
of the Port System to take the decision of rejection
of the original application, and for lack of planning
of the work which, entering into the assessment of merit, due to the absence of
public interest of the undertaking in relation to the current set-up
of the port of Gioia Tauro. Called into question,
in May 2023, the Regional Administrative Court of Reggio Calabria gave full
reason to the Port Authority. A decision that was
reaffirmed yesterday in the Final Act of the Council of Ministers.
State.
- Via Raffaele Paolucci 17r/19r - 16129 Genoa - ITALY
phone: +39.010.2462122, fax: +39.010.2516768, e-mail
VAT number: 03532950106
Press Reg.: nr 33/96 Genoa Court
Editor in chief: Bruno Bellio No part may be reproduced without the express permission of the publisher