Independent journal on economy and transport policy
22:53 GMT+2
This page has been automatically translated by Original news
The new ranking of the Economic World Forum on the infrastructural equipments of the world-wide nations
Italy is altogether in 82ª position and to 57° the place for the roads, to the 89° for the ports, the 40° for the railroads and the 67° for the airports
September 6, 2012
A doubt to this point is lawful: it is the Economic World Forum not to correctly interpret the information on the total state of infrastructures in Italy you supply to it from the national partner institute or is this last one, that is the SDA School Bites of Management of the University Bites, not to introduce to the Forum an adequate picture of the Italian infrastructural equipments?
Fact is that Italy is always down in the ranking of the quality of infrastructures of the world-wide nations elaborated from the foundation of Geneva, sopravanzata from Countries that appear manifestly less equipped. In the last "Global The Competitiveness Report 2012-2013" of the Economic World Forum Italy is classified to 82° the place for the total quality of its infrastructures, in regression regarding 79ª the position in which relationship 2011-2012 appeared in the precedence, to 73ª the position of relationship 2010-2011, to 72° the place of relationship 2009-2010 and to 73ª the position in it classifies introduced in relationship 2008-2009.
For that it concerns to street infrastructures Italy is installed to 57ª the position in relationship 2012-2013 while in the precedence relationships it was present respective in 59ª, 54ª, 53ª and 55ª position. In it classifies of the quality of harbour infrastructures Italy is to 89° the place regarding the precedence 81°, 81°, 83° and 95°. In the field of railway infrastructures Italy figure now in 40ª position while previously it turned out in 43ª, 39ª, 45ª and 52ª position. For infrastructure airport it is in 67ª position regarding the precedence 71ª, 84ª, 85ª and 78ª.
It is true that rankings as those on the infrastructural equipments elaborated by the Economic World Forum, that we publish below, can be read from various angles and can give dared to different interpretations of the proposed values which indices of the quality of infrastructures. It often is just so: there is who sees the glass full means and who empty means. However we inforMARE continue to consider that to some he is poured generous by drink leaving others disappointed.
Bruno Bellio
Economic world Forum
Global The Competitiveness Report 2012-2013
Infrastructure
Quality of overall infrastructure
How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony, and energy) in your country? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by
international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Switzerland
6.6
73
Swaziland
4.2
2
Singapore
6.5
74
Iran, Islamic Rep.
4.2
3
Finland
6.5
75
Liberia
4.2
4
Hong Kong SAR
6.5
76
Jamaica
4.2
5
France
6.4
77
Albania
4.2
6
United Arab Emirates
6.4
78
Kazakhstan
4.1
7
Iceland
6.3
79
Poland
4.0
8
Austria
6.3
80
Kenya
4.0
9
Germany
6.2
81
Uruguay
4.0
10
Netherlands
6.2
82
Italy
3.9
11
Portugal
6.2
83
Guyana
3.9
12
Luxembourg
6.2
84
Zambia
3.9
13
Denmark
6.0
85
Ecuador
3.9
14
Bahrain
6.0
86
Ghana
3.9
15
Canada
6.0
87
India
3.8
16
Japan
5.9
88
Egypt
3.8
17
Belgium
5.9
89
Evils
3.8
18
Spain
5.8
90
Tajikistan
3.7
19
Sweden
5.8
91
Macedonian, FYR
3.7
20
Oman
5.8
92
Indonesia
3.7
21
Barbados
5.8
93
Montenegro
3.7
22
Korea, Rep.
5.8
94
Chief Green
3.7
23
Saudi Arabia
5.8
95
Costa Rica
3.7
24
United Kingdom
5.6
96
Dominican Republic
3.7
25
United States
5.6
97
Honduras
3.7
26
Qatar
5.5
98
Philippines
3.6
27
Taiwan, Lowers
5.5
99
Côte d' Ivoire
3.6
28
Czech Republic
5.5
100
Ethiopia
3.6
29
Malaysia
5.4
101
Russian Federation
3.5
30
Slovenia
5.4
102
Algeria
3.5
31
Chile
5.4
103
Kyrgyz Republic
3.4
32
Estonia
5.4
104
Lesotho
3.4
33
Cyprus
5.3
105
Pakistan
3.4
34
Turkey
5.3
106
Nicaragua
3.4
35
Malta
5.2
107
Brazil
3.4
36
Australia
5.2
108
Colombia
3.4
37
Ireland
5.2
109
Senegal
3.4
38
Croatia
5.2
110
Uganda
3.4
39
Norway
5.2
111
Peru
3.4
40
Namibia
5.1
112
Argentina
3.4
41
Jordan
5.1
113
Moldova
3.3
42
Lithuania
5.1
114
Gabon
3.3
43
Brunei Darussalam
5.1
115
Bulgaria
3.3
44
Panama hat
5.1
116
Malawi
3.2
45
Israel
5.0
117
Nigeria
3.2
46
Puerto Rico
5.0
118
Bolivia
3.2
47
New Zealand
4.9
119
Vietnam
3.2
48
Rwanda
4.9
120
Serbia
3.2
49
Thailand
4.9
121
Benin
3.2
50
Sri Lanka
4.8
122
Cameroon
3.2
51
Hungary
4.8
123
Zimbabwe
3.2
52
Morocco
4.8
124
Tanzania
3.1
53
Mauritius
4.7
125
Madagascar
3.0
54
Seychelles
4.7
126
Mozambique
3.0
55
Georgia
4.6
127
Sierra Leone
2.9
56
Ukraine
4.6
128
Libya
2.9
57
Latvia
4.6
129
Nepal
2.9
58
South Africa
4.5
130
Yemen
2.8
59
Azerbaijan
4.5
131
Bangladesh
2.8
60
Kuwait
4.5
132
Rumania
2.8
61
Greece
4.5
133
Mauritania
2.8
62
Trinidad and Tobago
4.5
134
Chad
2.8
63
Gambia, The
4.5
135
Venezuela
2.8
64
Botswana
4.4
136
Burkina Faso
2.7
65
Mexico
4.4
137
Mongolia
2.7
66
El Salvador
4.4
138
Timor-Deft
2.7
67
Guatemala
4.4
139
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.7
68
Suriname
4.3
140
Paraguay
2.6
69
It lowers
4.3
141
Lebanon
2.4
70
Slovak Republic
4.3
142
Burundi
2.3
71
Armenia
4.3
143
Guinea
2.1
72
Cambodia
4.2
144
Haiti
1.9
SOURCE: Economic world Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
Quality of roads
How would you assess the roads in your country? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
France
6.5
73
Pakistan
3.9
2
United Arab Emirates
6.5
74
Trinidad and Tobago
3.8
3
Singapore
6.5
75
Nicaragua
3.8
4
Portugal
6.4
76
Liberia
3.8
5
Oman
6.4
77
Czech Republic
3.7
6
Switzerland
6.4
78
Slovak Republic
3.7
7
Austria
6.3
79
Guyana
3.7
8
Hong Kong SAR
6.3
80
Armenia
3.7
9
Finland
6.1
81
Uruguay
3.6
10
Germany
6.1
82
Evils
3.6
11
Netherlands
6.0
83
Jamaica
3.6
12
Saudi Arabia
6.0
84
Norway
3.6
13
Spain
5.9
85
Ghana
3.5
14
Japan
5.9
86
India
3.5
15
Luxembourg
5.9
87
Philippines
3.4
16
Canada
5.9
88
Algeria
3.4
17
Korea, Rep.
5.8
89
Malawi
3.4
18
Bahrain
5.8
90
Indonesia
3.4
19
Denmark
5.7
91
Guatemala
3.3
20
United States
5.7
92
Honduras
3.3
21
Taiwan, Lowers
5.7
93
Montenegro
3.2
22
Cyprus
5.6
94
Tanzania
3.2
23
Chile
5.6
95
Zimbabwe
3.2
24
United Kingdom
5.6
96
Zambia
3.2
25
Sweden
5.6
97
Senegal
3.2
26
Belgium
5.5
98
Tajikistan
3.2
27
Malaysia
5.4
99
Latvia
3.2
28
Ireland
5.4
100
Peru
3.1
29
Croatia
5.3
101
Bolivia
3.1
30
Brunei Darussalam
5.2
102
Libya
3.1
31
Iceland
5.2
103
Chad
3.1
32
Lithuania
5.2
104
Benin
3.1
33
Barbados
5.2
105
Malta
3.1
34
Qatar
5.1
106
Argentina
3.0
35
Namibia
5.1
107
Côte d' Ivoire
3.0
36
Australia
5.1
108
Macedonian, FYR
3.0
37
Puerto Rico
5.0
109
Egypt
2.9
38
Slovenia
5.0
110
Uganda
2.9
39
Thailand
5.0
111
Lesotho
2.9
40
Rwanda
5.0
112
Cameroon
2.9
41
New Zealand
4.9
113
Bangladesh
2.8
42
South Africa
4.9
114
Nigeria
2.8
43
Turkey
4.9
115
Lebanon
2.8
44
Kuwait
4.9
116
Sierra Leone
2.8
45
Jordan
4.8
117
Kazakhstan
2.7
46
Israel
4.7
118
Yemen
2.7
47
Swaziland
4.6
119
Mauritania
2.7
48
Sri Lanka
4.6
120
Vietnam
2.7
49
Panama hat
4.5
121
Burundi
2.7
50
Mexico
4.5
122
Serbia
2.7
51
Gambia, The
4.5
123
Brazil
2.7
52
El Salvador
4.5
124
Poland
2.6
53
Ecuador
4.4
125
Burkina Faso
2.6
54
It lowers
4.4
126
Colombia
2.6
55
Botswana
4.4
127
Nepal
2.6
56
Georgia
4.4
128
Venezuela
2.6
57
Italy
4.3
129
Bulgaria
2.5
58
Mauritius
4.3
130
Madagascar
2.5
59
Albania
4.3
131
Costa Rica
2.5
60
Seychelles
4.3
132
Paraguay
2.5
61
Estonia
4.2
133
Kyrgyz Republic
2.5
62
Dominican Republic
4.2
134
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.5
63
Suriname
4.1
135
Mozambique
2.4
64
Ethiopia
4.1
136
Russian Federation
2.3
65
Chief Green
4.1
137
Ukraine
2.3
66
Cambodia
4.0
138
Gabon
2.3
67
Azerbaijan
4.0
139
Timor-Deft
2.2
68
Iran, Islamic Rep.
4.0
140
Guinea
2.0
69
Hungary
4.0
141
Mongolia
2.0
70
Morocco
4.0
142
Rumania
1.9
71
Greece
4.0
143
Haiti
1.8
72
Kenya
3.9
144
Moldova
1.5
SOURCE: Economic world Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
Quality of railroad infrastructure
How would you assess the railroad system in your country? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Switzerland
6.8
73
Bangladesh
2.5
2
Japan
6.6
74
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.5
3
Hong Kong SAR
6.4
75
Cameroon
2.5
4
France
6.3
76
Zimbabwe
2.4
5
Singapore
5.7
77
Poland
2.4
6
Finland
5.7
78
Ecuador
2.3
7
Germany
5.7
79
Kyrgyz Republic
2.3
8
Spain
5.7
80
Zambia
2.3
9
Netherlands
5.7
81
Cambodia
2.3
10
Korea, Rep.
5.6
82
Tanzania
2.3
11
Taiwan, Lowers
5.5
83
Rumania
2.2
12
Austria
5.3
84
Malawi
2.2
13
Belgium
5.2
85
Nicaragua
2.2
14
Luxembourg
5.2
86
Puerto Rico
2.1
15
Canada
5.0
87
Côte d' Ivoire
2.1
16
United Kingdom
5.0
88
Brunei Darussalam
2.1
17
Malaysia
4.9
89
Mozambique
2.0
18
United States
4.8
90
Algeria
2.0
19
Denmark
4.8
91
Mauritania
2.0
20
Lithuania
4.7
92
Burkina Faso
2.0
21
Sweden
4.7
93
Macedonian, FYR
1.9
22
It lowers
4.6
94
Philippines
1.9
23
Czech Republic
4.6
95
Nigeria
1.9
24
Ukraine
4.5
96
Jordan
1.9
25
Slovak Republic
4.5
97
Peru
1.9
26
Portugal
4.5
98
Madagascar
1.9
27
India
4.4
99
Guyana
1.8
28
Australia
4.3
100
Brazil
1.8
29
Kazakhstan
4.3
101
El Salvador
1.8
30
Russian Federation
4.2
102
Serbia
1.7
31
Ireland
4.1
103
Argentina
1.7
32
Panama hat
4.0
104
Ghana
1.7
33
Latvia
4.0
105
Senegal
1.7
34
Georgia
4.0
106
Costa Rica
1.7
35
Azerbaijan
3.9
107
Benin
1.6
36
Morocco
3.9
108
Guinea
1.6
37
Sri Lanka
3.8
109
Colombia
1.6
38
Saudi Arabia
3.7
110
Lesotho
1.6
39
Namibia
3.7
111
Uganda
1.4
40
Italy
3.6
112
Ethiopia
1.4
41
New Zealand
3.6
113
Venezuela
1.4
42
Hungary
3.5
114
Sierra Leone
1.3
43
Tajikistan
3.5
115
Uruguay
1.3
44
Estonia
3.5
116
Haiti
1.3
45
Iran, Islamic Rep.
3.4
117
Jamaica
1.3
46
South Africa
3.4
118
Guatemala
1.2
47
Norway
3.3
119
Albania
1.2
48
Swaziland
3.2
120
Honduras
1.1
49
Croatia
3.2
121
Suriname
1.1
50
Israel
3.2
122
Nepal
1.1
51
Indonesia
3.2
123
Paraguay
1.1
52
Egypt
3.1
124
Lebanon
1.0
53
Turkey
3.1
n/a
Bahrain
n/appl.
54
Slovenia
3.1
n/a
Barbados
n/appl.
55
Botswana
3.1
n/a
Burundi
n/appl.
56
Bulgaria
3.0
n/a
Chief Green
n/appl.
57
Bolivia
3.0
n/a
Chad
n/appl.
58
Montenegro
2.9
n/a
Cyprus
n/appl.
59
Liberia
2.9
n/a
Gambia, The
n/appl.
60
Mexico
2.8
n/a
Iceland
n/appl.
61
Evils
2.7
n/a
Kuwait
n/appl.
62
Dominican Republic
2.7
n/a
Libya
n/appl.
63
Armenia
2.6
n/a
Malta
n/appl.
64
Chile
2.6
n/a
Mauritius
n/appl.
65
Thailand
2.6
n/a
Oman
n/appl.
66
Pakistan
2.6
n/a
Qatar
n/appl.
67
Gabon
2.6
n/a
Rwanda
n/appl.
68
Vietnam
2.6
n/a
Seychelles
n/appl.
69
Greece
2.5
n/a
Timor-Deft
n/appl.
70
Moldova
2.5
n/a
Trinidad and Tobago
n/appl.
71
Mongolia
2.5
n/a
United Arab Emirates
n/appl.
72
Kenya
2.5
n/a
Yemen
n/appl.
SOURCE: Economic world Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
NOTES: n/appl. is used for economies to where the railroad Network totals less than 50 km.
Quality of port infrastructure
How would you assess the port facilities in your country? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = well developed and efficient by international standards]. For landlocked countries, the question is as follows: How accessible are port facilities? [1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Netherlands
6.8
73
Kuwait
4.1
2
Singapore
6.8
74
Mali1
4.1
3
Hong Kong SAR
6.5
75
Ukraine
4.0
4
Panama hat
6.4
76
Ghana
4.0
5
United Arab Emirates
6.4
77
Croatia
4.0
6
Belgium
6.3
78
Azerbaijan1
4.0
7
Finland
6.3
79
Egypt
4.0
8
Iceland
6.2
80
India
4.0
9
Germany
6.0
81
Iran, Islamic Rep.
4.0
10
Bahrain
6.0
82
Slovak Republic1
4.0
11
Sweden
5.9
83
Hungary1
4.0
12
United Kingdom
5.8
84
Guatemala
4.0
13
Denmark
5.8
85
Chief Green
3.9
14
Spain
5.8
86
El Salvador
3.9
15
Malta
5.7
87
Israel
3.9
16
Canada
5.7
88
Ecuador
3.9
17
Barbados
5.6
89
Italy
3.9
18
Estonia
5.6
90
Uganda1
3.8
19
United States
5.6
91
Kenya
3.8
20
Korea, Rep.
5.5
92
Trinidad and Tobago
3.8
21
Malaysia
5.5
93
Russian Federation
3.7
22
New Zealand
5.5
94
Malawi1
3.7
23
Luxembourg1
5.5
95
Benin
3.7
24
Oman
5.4
96
Albania
3.7
25
Norway
5.4
97
Botswana1
3.7
26
France
5.4
98
Mauritania
3.7
27
Namibia
5.4
99
Cameroon
3.7
28
Saudi Arabia
5.3
100
Bulgaria
3.7
29
Taiwan, Lowers
5.3
101
Argentina
3.6
30
Ireland
5.3
102
Montenegro
3.6
31
Japan
5.2
103
Burkina Faso1
3.6
32
Puerto Rico
5.2
104
Indonesia
3.6
33
Slovenia
5.2
105
Paraguay
13.6
34
Chile
5.2
106
Nigeria
3.6
35
Lithuania
5.2
107
Guinea
3.5
36
Qatar
5.2
108
Poland
3.5
37
Switzerland1
5.2
109
Rwanda1
3.5
38
Australia
5.1
110
Ethiopia1
3.5
39
Jamaica
5.1
111
Peru
3.5
40
Portugal
5.0
112
Libya
3.5
41
Cyprus
5.0
113
Vietnam
3.4
42
Suriname
5.0
114
Lesotho1
3.4
43
Seychelles
5.0
115
Kazakhstan1
3.4
44
Austria1
4.9
116
Mozambique
3.4
45
Sri Lanka
4.9
117
Tanzania
3.3
46
Uruguay
4.9
118
Sierra Leone
3.3
47
Gambia, The
4.8
119
Guyana
3.3
48
Mauritius
4.8
120
Philippines
3.3
49
Morocco
4.8
121
Bangladesh
3.3
50
Latvia
4.8
122
Bolivia1
3.3
51
Dominican Republic
4.7
123
Madagascar
3.2
52
South Africa
4.7
124
Nicaragua
3.2
53
Côte d' Ivoire
4.6
125
Colombia
3.2
54
Czech Republic1
4.6
126
Mongolia1
3.0
55
Honduras
4.6
127
Armenia1
3.0
56
Thailand
4.6
128
Yemen
3.0
57
Brunei Darussalam
4.5
129
Moldova1
3.0
58
Senegal
4.5
130
Chad1
2.8
59
It lowers
4.4
131
Algeria
2.7
60
Pakistan
4.4
132
Timor-Deft
2.7
61
Zimbabwe1
4.4
133
Nepal1
2.7
62
Jordan
4.4
134
Serbia1
2.7
63
Turkey
4.4
135
Brazil
2.6
64
Mexico
4.3
136
Burundi1
2.6
65
Georgia
4.3
137
Rumania
2.6
66
Greece
4.2
138
Gabon
2.6
67
Macedonian, FYR1
4.2
139
Venezuela
2.5
68
Swaziland1
4.2
140
Costa Rica
2.4
69
Cambodia
4.2
141
Haiti
1.9
70
Zambia1
4.1
142
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.7
71
Lebanon
4.1
143
Tajikistan1
1.7
72
Liberia
4.1
144
Kyrgyz Republic1
1.5
SOURCE: Economic world Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
1 Landlocked
Quality of air transport infrastructure
How would you assess passenger air transport infrastructure in your country? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Singapore
6.8
73
Estonia
4.5
2
Hong Kong SAR
6.7
74
Peru
4.5
3
United Arab Emirates
6.6
75
Cambodia
4.4
4
Netherlands
6.6
76
Montenegro
4.4
5
Switzerland
6.5
77
Senegal
4.4
6
Panama hat
6.4
78
Pakistan
4.3
7
Germany
6.4
79
Croatia
4.3
8
Barbados
6.3
80
Ecuador
4.3
9
Iceland
6.2
81
Chief Green
4.3
10
France
6.2
82
Georgia
4.3
11
Finland
6.2
83
Côte d' Ivoire
4.3
12
New Zealand
6.2
84
Rwanda
4.3
13
Norway
6.2
85
Ukraine
4.3
14
Belgium
6.2
86
Lithuania
4.2
15
South Africa
6.1
87
Kuwait
4.2
16
Bahrain
6.0
88
Tajikistan
4.2
17
Spain
6.0
89
Indonesia
4.2
18
Qatar
6.0
90
Nicaragua
4.2
19
Denmark
6.0
91
Hungary
4.2
20
Sweden
6.0
92
Evils
4.2
21
Czech Republic
6.0
93
Guyana
4.1
22
United Kingdom
6.0
94
Vietnam
4.1
23
Canada
5.9
95
Kazakhstan
4.1
24
Malaysia
5.9
96
Botswana
4.1
25
Malta
5.9
97
Ghana
4.1
26
Korea, Rep.
5.9
98
Liberia
4.0
27
Luxembourg
5.8
99
Suriname
4.0
28
Puerto Rico
5.8
100
Nigeria
4.0
29
Australia
5.8
101
Bulgaria
4.0
30
United States
5.8
102
Zambia
3.9
31
Austria
5.8
103
Mozambique
3.9
32
Ireland
5.7
104
Russian Federation
3.8
33
Thailand
5.7
105
Poland
3.8
34
Saudi Arabia
5.7
106
Colombia
3.8
35
Portugal
5.6
107
Uganda
3.8
36
Turkey
5.6
108
Gabon
3.7
37
Jamaica
5.5
109
Cameroon
3.7
38
Jordan
5.5
110
Guinea
3.6
39
Chile
5.5
111
Macedonian, FYR
3.6
40
Oman
5.5
112
Philippines
3.6
41
Dominican Republic
5.4
113
Moldova
3.6
42
El Salvador
5.4
114
Madagascar
3.6
43
Cyprus
5.4
115
Argentina
3.5
44
Taiwan, Lowers
5.4
116
Swaziland
3.5
45
Greece
5.3
117
Tanzania
3.5
46
Japan
5.3
118
Bolivia
3.5
47
Latvia
5.3
119
Yemen
3.5
48
Israel
5.3
120
Bangladesh
3.5
49
Mauritius
5.2
121
Rumania
3.4
50
Ethiopia
5.1
122
Zimbabwe
3.4
51
Lebanon
5.1
123
Benin
3.4
52
Morocco
5.1
124
Slovak Republic
3.4
53
Azerbaijan
5.0
125
Algeria
3.3
54
Egypt
5.0
126
Venezuela
3.3
55
Seychelles
5.0
127
Burkina Faso
3.3
56
Trinidad and Tobago
5.0
128
Mongolia
3.3
57
Sri Lanka
5.0
129
Libya
3.3
58
Guatemala
4.9
130
Serbia
3.2
59
Namibia
4.9
131
Nepal
3.2
60
Costa Rica
4.9
132
Iran, Islamic Rep.
3.1
61
Brunei Darussalam
4.9
133
Malawi
3.1
62
Gambia, The
4.9
134
Brazil
3.0
63
Uruguay
4.9
135
Kyrgyz Republic
2.9
64
Mexico
4.8
136
Chad
2.9
65
Kenya
4.8
137
Timor-Deft
2.9
66
Albania
4.8
138
Mauritania
2.8
67
Italy
4.7
139
Burundi
2.8
68
India
4.7
140
Sierra Leone
2.7
69
Armenia
4.7
141
Paraguay
2.5
70
It lowers
4.5
142
Lesotho
2.5
71
Honduras
4.5
143
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.3
72
Slovenia
4.5
144
Haiti
2.2
SOURCE: Economic world Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
- Via Raffaele Paolucci 17r/19r - 16129 Genoa - ITALY
phone: +39.010.2462122, fax: +39.010.2516768, e-mail
VAT number: 03532950106
Press Reg.: nr 33/96 Genoa Court
Editor in chief: Bruno Bellio No part may be reproduced without the express permission of the publisher