El escalafón nuevo de la World Economic foro sobre las dotaciones infraestructurales de las naciones mundiales
La Italia es en posición puestas y al 57° para las carreteras en conjunto 82ª, al 89°, a y a para los puertos, el 40°, el 67° para las vías férreas para los aeropuertos
6 Septembre 2012
Una duda a estas alturas es lícita: ¿es la World Economic no interpretar las informaciones sobre el estado global de las infraestructuras en Italia foro a correctamente les suministráis de la pareja nacional institute o bien es este último o la SDA, bocados School of dirección de la universidad bocados, a no mostrar un cuadro adecuado de las dotaciones infraestructurales italianas al foro?
Fatto está de países que aparecen arrolladoramente menos pertrechado que la Italia es en el escalafón de la calidad de las infraestructuras de las naciones mundiales de la fundación de Ginebra siempre abajo de elaborado, sopravanzata. "The Global Competitiveness Report" de la World Economic en el último es clasificado al 82° para la calidad global de sus infraestructuras "2012-2013" foros la Italia puesto, precede ratio 2011-2012 en arretramento con respecto a la posición 79ª, a la posición del ratio 2010-2011 73ª, al 72° puesto del ratio 2009-2010 en que comparecía en y clasifica a la posición en el ratio 2008-2009 73ª mostrado.
Concierne para que a las infraestructuras viarias la Italia posesiona a la posición en el ratio 2012-2013 57ª mientras que participaba en las relaciones precedentes en 59ª respectivamente, 54ª, 53ª y 55ª posición. La Italia al 89° en clasifica de la calidad de las infraestructuras portuarias pone con respecto a los precedentes 81°, 81°, 83° y 95°. La Italia figura en el sector de las infraestructuras ferroviarias en posición a estas fechas 40ª mientras que previamente resultaba en 43ª, 39ª, 45ª y 52ª posición. Es para las infraestructuras aeroportuarias en posición con respecto a los precedentes 67ª 71ª, 84ª, 85ª y 78ª.
Escalafones como ése sobre las dotaciones infraestructurales elaboradas foro de la World Economic es verdad que pueden ser de angolature discrepantes leídos y pueden dar interpretaciones distintas de las valentías propuestas tomado, que publicamos de séquito, índices cuáles de la calidad de las infraestructuras. Sovente es precisamente así: es y medio quién vacío quién ve medio lleno el vaso. No obstante inforMARE de nosotros continuamos a considerar que soy vertido a alguno a desprendidamente beber dejando otros a boca seca.
Bruno Bellio
World Economic foro
The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013
Infrastructure
Quality of overall infrastructure
How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony, and energy) en country your? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by
international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Switzerland
6.6
73
Suazilandia
4.2
2
Singapur
6.5
74
Irán, Islamic Rep_.,
4.2
3
Finland
6.5
75
Liberia
4.2
4
Hong Kong SAR
6.5
76
Jamaica
4.2
5
France
6.4
77
Albania
4.2
6
United Arab Emirates
6.4
78
Kazakhstan
4.1
7
Iceland
6.3
79
Poland
4.0
8
Austria
6.3
80
Kenya
4.0
9
Germany
6.2
81
Uruguay
4.0
10
Netherlands
6.2
82
Italy
3.9
11
Portugal
6.2
83
Guyana
3.9
12
Luxembourg
6.2
84
Zambia
3.9
13
Denmark
6.0
85
Ecuador
3.9
14
Bahrain
6.0
86
Ghana
3.9
15
Canadá
6.0
87
India
3.8
16
Japan
5.9
88
Egypt
3.8
17
Belgium
5.9
89
Malí
3.8
18
Spain
5.8
90
Tajikistan
3.7
19
Sweden
5.8
91
Macedonia, FYR,
3.7
20
Omán
5.8
92
Indonesia
3.7
21
Barbados
5.8
93
Montenegro
3.7
22
Korea, Rep_.,
5.8
94
Cape Verdes
3.7
23
Saudi Arabia
5.8
95
Costa Rica
3.7
24
United Kingdom
5.6
96
Dominican Republic
3.7
25
United States
5.6
97
Honduras
3.7
26
Qatar
5.5
98
Philippines
3.6
27
Taiwán Inclina
5.5
99
Côte Ivoire D' de
3.6
28
Czech Republic
5.5
100
Ethiopia
3.6
29
Malasia
5.4
101
Russian Federation
3.5
30
Eslovenia
5.4
102
Argelia
3.5
31
Chile
5.4
103
Kyrgyz Republic
3.4
32
Estonia
5.4
104
Lesotho
3.4
33
Cyprus
5.3
105
Pakistán
3.4
34
Turkey
5.3
106
Nicaragua
3.4
35
Malta
5.2
107
Brazil
3.4
36
Australia
5.2
108
Colombia
3.4
37
Ireland
5.2
109
Senegal
3.4
38
Croatia
5.2
110
Uganda
3.4
39
Norway
5.2
111
Perú
3.4
40
Namibia
5.1
112
Argentina
3.4
41
Jordan
5.1
113
Moldova
3.3
42
Lithuania
5.1
114
Gabón
3.3
43
Brunéi Darussalam
5.1
115
Bulgaria
3.3
44
Panamá
5.1
116
Malawi
3.2
45
Israel
5.0
117
Nigeria
3.2
46
Puerto Rico
5.0
118
Bolivia
3.2
47
New Zealand
4.9
119
Vietnam
3.2
48
Rwanda
4.9
120
Serbia
3.2
49
Thailand
4.9
121
Benín
3.2
50
Sri Lanka
4.8
122
Cameroon
3.2
51
Hungary
4.8
123
Zimbabwe
3.2
52
Morocco
4.8
124
Tanzania
3.1
53
Mauricio
4.7
125
Madagascar
3.0
54
Seychelles
4.7
126
Mozambique
3.0
55
Georgia
4.6
127
Sierra Leone
2.9
56
Ukraine
4.6
128
Libya
2.9
57
Latvia
4.6
129
Nepal
2.9
58
South áfrica
4.5
130
Yemen
2.8
59
Azerbaijan
4.5
131
Bangladesh
2.8
60
Kuwait
4.5
132
Rumania
2.8
61
Greece
4.5
133
Mauritania
2.8
62
Trinidad Tobago and
4.5
134
Chad
2.8
63
Gambia, The,
4.5
135
Venezuela
2.8
64
Botswana
4.4
136
Burkina Faso
2.7
65
Mexico
4.4
137
Mongolia
2.7
66
El Salvador
4.4
138
Timor-presto
2.7
67
Guatemala
4.4
139
Bosnia Herzegovina and
2.7
68
Surinam
4.3
140
Paraguay
2.6
69
Inclina
4.3
141
Lebanon
2.4
70
Slovak Republic
4.3
142
Burundi
2.3
71
Armenia
4.3
143
Guinea
2.1
72
Cambodia
4.2
144
Haití
1.9
SOURCE: World Economic foro, Executive Opinion Survey,
Quality of roads
How en country would you assess the roads your? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
France
6.5
73
Pakistán
3.9
2
United Arab Emirates
6.5
74
Trinidad Tobago and
3.8
3
Singapur
6.5
75
Nicaragua
3.8
4
Portugal
6.4
76
Liberia
3.8
5
Omán
6.4
77
Czech Republic
3.7
6
Switzerland
6.4
78
Slovak Republic
3.7
7
Austria
6.3
79
Guyana
3.7
8
Hong Kong SAR
6.3
80
Armenia
3.7
9
Finland
6.1
81
Uruguay
3.6
10
Germany
6.1
82
Malí
3.6
11
Netherlands
6.0
83
Jamaica
3.6
12
Saudi Arabia
6.0
84
Norway
3.6
13
Spain
5.9
85
Ghana
3.5
14
Japan
5.9
86
India
3.5
15
Luxembourg
5.9
87
Philippines
3.4
16
Canadá
5.9
88
Argelia
3.4
17
Korea, Rep_.,
5.8
89
Malawi
3.4
18
Bahrain
5.8
90
Indonesia
3.4
19
Denmark
5.7
91
Guatemala
3.3
20
United States
5.7
92
Honduras
3.3
21
Taiwán Inclina
5.7
93
Montenegro
3.2
22
Cyprus
5.6
94
Tanzania
3.2
23
Chile
5.6
95
Zimbabwe
3.2
24
United Kingdom
5.6
96
Zambia
3.2
25
Sweden
5.6
97
Senegal
3.2
26
Belgium
5.5
98
Tajikistan
3.2
27
Malasia
5.4
99
Latvia
3.2
28
Ireland
5.4
100
Perú
3.1
29
Croatia
5.3
101
Bolivia
3.1
30
Brunéi Darussalam
5.2
102
Libya
3.1
31
Iceland
5.2
103
Chad
3.1
32
Lithuania
5.2
104
Benín
3.1
33
Barbados
5.2
105
Malta
3.1
34
Qatar
5.1
106
Argentina
3.0
35
Namibia
5.1
107
Côte Ivoire D' de
3.0
36
Australia
5.1
108
Macedonia, FYR,
3.0
37
Puerto Rico
5.0
109
Egypt
2.9
38
Eslovenia
5.0
110
Uganda
2.9
39
Thailand
5.0
111
Lesotho
2.9
40
Rwanda
5.0
112
Cameroon
2.9
41
New Zealand
4.9
113
Bangladesh
2.8
42
South áfrica
4.9
114
Nigeria
2.8
43
Turkey
4.9
115
Lebanon
2.8
44
Kuwait
4.9
116
Sierra Leone
2.8
45
Jordan
4.8
117
Kazakhstan
2.7
46
Israel
4.7
118
Yemen
2.7
47
Suazilandia
4.6
119
Mauritania
2.7
48
Sri Lanka
4.6
120
Vietnam
2.7
49
Panamá
4.5
121
Burundi
2.7
50
Mexico
4.5
122
Serbia
2.7
51
Gambia, The,
4.5
123
Brazil
2.7
52
El Salvador
4.5
124
Poland
2.6
53
Ecuador
4.4
125
Burkina Faso
2.6
54
Inclina
4.4
126
Colombia
2.6
55
Botswana
4.4
127
Nepal
2.6
56
Georgia
4.4
128
Venezuela
2.6
57
Italy
4.3
129
Bulgaria
2.5
58
Mauricio
4.3
130
Madagascar
2.5
59
Albania
4.3
131
Costa Rica
2.5
60
Seychelles
4.3
132
Paraguay
2.5
61
Estonia
4.2
133
Kyrgyz Republic
2.5
62
Dominican Republic
4.2
134
Bosnia Herzegovina and
2.5
63
Surinam
4.1
135
Mozambique
2.4
64
Ethiopia
4.1
136
Russian Federation
2.3
65
Cape Verdes
4.1
137
Ukraine
2.3
66
Cambodia
4.0
138
Gabón
2.3
67
Azerbaijan
4.0
139
Timor-presto
2.2
68
Irán, Islamic Rep_.,
4.0
140
Guinea
2.0
69
Hungary
4.0
141
Mongolia
2.0
70
Morocco
4.0
142
Rumania
1.9
71
Greece
4.0
143
Haití
1.8
72
Kenya
3.9
144
Moldova
1.5
SOURCE: World Economic foro, Executive Opinion Survey,
Quality of railroad infrastructure
How en country would you assess the railroad system your? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Switzerland
6.8
73
Bangladesh
2.5
2
Japan
6.6
74
Bosnia Herzegovina and
2.5
3
Hong Kong SAR
6.4
75
Cameroon
2.5
4
France
6.3
76
Zimbabwe
2.4
5
Singapur
5.7
77
Poland
2.4
6
Finland
5.7
78
Ecuador
2.3
7
Germany
5.7
79
Kyrgyz Republic
2.3
8
Spain
5.7
80
Zambia
2.3
9
Netherlands
5.7
81
Cambodia
2.3
10
Korea, Rep_.,
5.6
82
Tanzania
2.3
11
Taiwán Inclina
5.5
83
Rumania
2.2
12
Austria
5.3
84
Malawi
2.2
13
Belgium
5.2
85
Nicaragua
2.2
14
Luxembourg
5.2
86
Puerto Rico
2.1
15
Canadá
5.0
87
Côte Ivoire D' de
2.1
16
United Kingdom
5.0
88
Brunéi Darussalam
2.1
17
Malasia
4.9
89
Mozambique
2.0
18
United States
4.8
90
Argelia
2.0
19
Denmark
4.8
91
Mauritania
2.0
20
Lithuania
4.7
92
Burkina Faso
2.0
21
Sweden
4.7
93
Macedonia, FYR,
1.9
22
Inclina
4.6
94
Philippines
1.9
23
Czech Republic
4.6
95
Nigeria
1.9
24
Ukraine
4.5
96
Jordan
1.9
25
Slovak Republic
4.5
97
Perú
1.9
26
Portugal
4.5
98
Madagascar
1.9
27
India
4.4
99
Guyana
1.8
28
Australia
4.3
100
Brazil
1.8
29
Kazakhstan
4.3
101
El Salvador
1.8
30
Russian Federation
4.2
102
Serbia
1.7
31
Ireland
4.1
103
Argentina
1.7
32
Panamá
4.0
104
Ghana
1.7
33
Latvia
4.0
105
Senegal
1.7
34
Georgia
4.0
106
Costa Rica
1.7
35
Azerbaijan
3.9
107
Benín
1.6
36
Morocco
3.9
108
Guinea
1.6
37
Sri Lanka
3.8
109
Colombia
1.6
38
Saudi Arabia
3.7
110
Lesotho
1.6
39
Namibia
3.7
111
Uganda
1.4
40
Italy
3.6
112
Ethiopia
1.4
41
New Zealand
3.6
113
Venezuela
1.4
42
Hungary
3.5
114
Sierra Leone
1.3
43
Tajikistan
3.5
115
Uruguay
1.3
44
Estonia
3.5
116
Haití
1.3
45
Irán, Islamic Rep_.,
3.4
117
Jamaica
1.3
46
South áfrica
3.4
118
Guatemala
1.2
47
Norway
3.3
119
Albania
1.2
48
Suazilandia
3.2
120
Honduras
1.1
49
Croatia
3.2
121
Surinam
1.1
50
Israel
3.2
122
Nepal
1.1
51
Indonesia
3.2
123
Paraguay
1.1
52
Egypt
3.1
124
Lebanon
1.0
53
Turkey
3.1
n/a
Bahrain
n/appl.
54
Eslovenia
3.1
n/a
Barbados
n/appl.
55
Botswana
3.1
n/a
Burundi
n/appl.
56
Bulgaria
3.0
n/a
Cape Verdes
n/appl.
57
Bolivia
3.0
n/a
Chad
n/appl.
58
Montenegro
2.9
n/a
Cyprus
n/appl.
59
Liberia
2.9
n/a
Gambia, The,
n/appl.
60
Mexico
2.8
n/a
Iceland
n/appl.
61
Malí
2.7
n/a
Kuwait
n/appl.
62
Dominican Republic
2.7
n/a
Libya
n/appl.
63
Armenia
2.6
n/a
Malta
n/appl.
64
Chile
2.6
n/a
Mauricio
n/appl.
65
Thailand
2.6
n/a
Omán
n/appl.
66
Pakistán
2.6
n/a
Qatar
n/appl.
67
Gabón
2.6
n/a
Rwanda
n/appl.
68
Vietnam
2.6
n/a
Seychelles
n/appl.
69
Greece
2.5
n/a
Timor-presto
n/appl.
70
Moldova
2.5
n/a
Trinidad Tobago and
n/appl.
71
Mongolia
2.5
n/a
United Arab Emirates
n/appl.
72
Kenya
2.5
n/a
Yemen
n/appl.
SOURCE: World Economic foro, Executive Opinion Survey,
NOTAS: n/appl. is used for economies where 50 km. network the railroad totals less than
Quality of port infrastructure
How en country would you assess the port facilities your? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = well developed and efficient by international standards]. For landlocked countries, the question is as follows: How accessible ara port facilities? [1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Netherlands
6.8
73
Kuwait
4.1
2
Singapur
6.8
74
Mali1
4.1
3
Hong Kong SAR
6.5
75
Ukraine
4.0
4
Panamá
6.4
76
Ghana
4.0
5
United Arab Emirates
6.4
77
Croatia
4.0
6
Belgium
6.3
78
Azerbaijan1
4.0
7
Finland
6.3
79
Egypt
4.0
8
Iceland
6.2
80
India
4.0
9
Germany
6.0
81
Irán, Islamic Rep_.,
4.0
10
Bahrain
6.0
82
Slovak Republic1
4.0
11
Sweden
5.9
83
Hungary1
4.0
12
United Kingdom
5.8
84
Guatemala
4.0
13
Denmark
5.8
85
Cape Verdes
3.9
14
Spain
5.8
86
El Salvador
3.9
15
Malta
5.7
87
Israel
3.9
16
Canadá
5.7
88
Ecuador
3.9
17
Barbados
5.6
89
Italy
3.9
18
Estonia
5.6
90
Uganda1
3.8
19
United States
5.6
91
Kenya
3.8
20
Korea, Rep_.,
5.5
92
Trinidad Tobago and
3.8
21
Malasia
5.5
93
Russian Federation
3.7
22
New Zealand
5.5
94
Malawi1
3.7
23
Luxembourg1
5.5
95
Benín
3.7
24
Omán
5.4
96
Albania
3.7
25
Norway
5.4
97
Botswana1
3.7
26
France
5.4
98
Mauritania
3.7
27
Namibia
5.4
99
Cameroon
3.7
28
Saudi Arabia
5.3
100
Bulgaria
3.7
29
Taiwán Inclina
5.3
101
Argentina
3.6
30
Ireland
5.3
102
Montenegro
3.6
31
Japan
5.2
103
Burkina Faso1
3.6
32
Puerto Rico
5.2
104
Indonesia
3.6
33
Eslovenia
5.2
105
Paraguay
13.6
34
Chile
5.2
106
Nigeria
3.6
35
Lithuania
5.2
107
Guinea
3.5
36
Qatar
5.2
108
Poland
3.5
37
Switzerland1
5.2
109
Rwanda1
3.5
38
Australia
5.1
110
Ethiopia1
3.5
39
Jamaica
5.1
111
Perú
3.5
40
Portugal
5.0
112
Libya
3.5
41
Cyprus
5.0
113
Vietnam
3.4
42
Surinam
5.0
114
Lesotho1
3.4
43
Seychelles
5.0
115
Kazakhstan1
3.4
44
Austria1
4.9
116
Mozambique
3.4
45
Sri Lanka
4.9
117
Tanzania
3.3
46
Uruguay
4.9
118
Sierra Leone
3.3
47
Gambia, The,
4.8
119
Guyana
3.3
48
Mauricio
4.8
120
Philippines
3.3
49
Morocco
4.8
121
Bangladesh
3.3
50
Latvia
4.8
122
Bolivia1
3.3
51
Dominican Republic
4.7
123
Madagascar
3.2
52
South áfrica
4.7
124
Nicaragua
3.2
53
Côte Ivoire D' de
4.6
125
Colombia
3.2
54
Czech Republic1
4.6
126
Mongolia1
3.0
55
Honduras
4.6
127
Armenia1
3.0
56
Thailand
4.6
128
Yemen
3.0
57
Brunéi Darussalam
4.5
129
Moldova1
3.0
58
Senegal
4.5
130
Chad1
2.8
59
Inclina
4.4
131
Argelia
2.7
60
Pakistán
4.4
132
Timor-presto
2.7
61
Zimbabwe1
4.4
133
Nepal1
2.7
62
Jordan
4.4
134
Serbia1
2.7
63
Turkey
4.4
135
Brazil
2.6
64
Mexico
4.3
136
Burundi1
2.6
65
Georgia
4.3
137
Rumania
2.6
66
Greece
4.2
138
Gabón
2.6
67
Macedonia, FYR1,
4.2
139
Venezuela
2.5
68
Swaziland1
4.2
140
Costa Rica
2.4
69
Cambodia
4.2
141
Haití
1.9
70
Zambia1
4.1
142
Bosnia Herzegovina and
1.7
71
Lebanon
4.1
143
Tajikistan1
1.7
72
Liberia
4.1
144
Kyrgyz Republic1
1.5
SOURCE: World Economic foro, Executive Opinion Survey,
1 Landlocked
Quality of air transport infrastructure
How would you assess passenger air transport infrastructure en country your? [1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards] | 2011-12 weighted average
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
RANK
COUNTRY/ECONOMY
VALUE
1
Singapur
6.8
73
Estonia
4.5
2
Hong Kong SAR
6.7
74
Perú
4.5
3
United Arab Emirates
6.6
75
Cambodia
4.4
4
Netherlands
6.6
76
Montenegro
4.4
5
Switzerland
6.5
77
Senegal
4.4
6
Panamá
6.4
78
Pakistán
4.3
7
Germany
6.4
79
Croatia
4.3
8
Barbados
6.3
80
Ecuador
4.3
9
Iceland
6.2
81
Cape Verdes
4.3
10
France
6.2
82
Georgia
4.3
11
Finland
6.2
83
Côte Ivoire D' de
4.3
12
New Zealand
6.2
84
Rwanda
4.3
13
Norway
6.2
85
Ukraine
4.3
14
Belgium
6.2
86
Lithuania
4.2
15
South áfrica
6.1
87
Kuwait
4.2
16
Bahrain
6.0
88
Tajikistan
4.2
17
Spain
6.0
89
Indonesia
4.2
18
Qatar
6.0
90
Nicaragua
4.2
19
Denmark
6.0
91
Hungary
4.2
20
Sweden
6.0
92
Malí
4.2
21
Czech Republic
6.0
93
Guyana
4.1
22
United Kingdom
6.0
94
Vietnam
4.1
23
Canadá
5.9
95
Kazakhstan
4.1
24
Malasia
5.9
96
Botswana
4.1
25
Malta
5.9
97
Ghana
4.1
26
Korea, Rep_.,
5.9
98
Liberia
4.0
27
Luxembourg
5.8
99
Surinam
4.0
28
Puerto Rico
5.8
100
Nigeria
4.0
29
Australia
5.8
101
Bulgaria
4.0
30
United States
5.8
102
Zambia
3.9
31
Austria
5.8
103
Mozambique
3.9
32
Ireland
5.7
104
Russian Federation
3.8
33
Thailand
5.7
105
Poland
3.8
34
Saudi Arabia
5.7
106
Colombia
3.8
35
Portugal
5.6
107
Uganda
3.8
36
Turkey
5.6
108
Gabón
3.7
37
Jamaica
5.5
109
Cameroon
3.7
38
Jordan
5.5
110
Guinea
3.6
39
Chile
5.5
111
Macedonia, FYR,
3.6
40
Omán
5.5
112
Philippines
3.6
41
Dominican Republic
5.4
113
Moldova
3.6
42
El Salvador
5.4
114
Madagascar
3.6
43
Cyprus
5.4
115
Argentina
3.5
44
Taiwán Inclina
5.4
116
Suazilandia
3.5
45
Greece
5.3
117
Tanzania
3.5
46
Japan
5.3
118
Bolivia
3.5
47
Latvia
5.3
119
Yemen
3.5
48
Israel
5.3
120
Bangladesh
3.5
49
Mauricio
5.2
121
Rumania
3.4
50
Ethiopia
5.1
122
Zimbabwe
3.4
51
Lebanon
5.1
123
Benín
3.4
52
Morocco
5.1
124
Slovak Republic
3.4
53
Azerbaijan
5.0
125
Argelia
3.3
54
Egypt
5.0
126
Venezuela
3.3
55
Seychelles
5.0
127
Burkina Faso
3.3
56
Trinidad Tobago and
5.0
128
Mongolia
3.3
57
Sri Lanka
5.0
129
Libya
3.3
58
Guatemala
4.9
130
Serbia
3.2
59
Namibia
4.9
131
Nepal
3.2
60
Costa Rica
4.9
132
Irán, Islamic Rep_.,
3.1
61
Brunéi Darussalam
4.9
133
Malawi
3.1
62
Gambia, The,
4.9
134
Brazil
3.0
63
Uruguay
4.9
135
Kyrgyz Republic
2.9
64
Mexico
4.8
136
Chad
2.9
65
Kenya
4.8
137
Timor-presto
2.9
66
Albania
4.8
138
Mauritania
2.8
67
Italy
4.7
139
Burundi
2.8
68
India
4.7
140
Sierra Leone
2.7
69
Armenia
4.7
141
Paraguay
2.5
70
Inclina
4.5
142
Lesotho
2.5
71
Honduras
4.5
143
Bosnia Herzegovina and
2.3
72
Eslovenia
4.5
144
Haití
2.2
SOURCE: World Economic foro, Executive Opinion Survey,
- Via Raffaele Paolucci 17r/19r - 16129 Génova - ITALIA
tel.: +39.010.2462122, fax: +39.010.2516768, e-mail
Partita iva: 03532950106
Registrazione Stampa 33/96 Tribunale di Genova
Director: Bruno Bellio Prohibida la reproducción, total o parcial, sin el explicito consentimento del editor